Category Archives: News / Announcements

Posts

Winnow, winnow, winnow…

I’ve heard from several more teams (Space Elevator Team at UT, Recens, Team Rambo I / Team Telsa, Queens Space Elevator Racing Team, Lone Star and MIT) that they are NOT competing this year in the Climber / Power-Beaming competition (MIT will still be competing in the Tether competition).

So, this is what I know so far:

Teams definitely in:

#230 – McGill  Space Elevator Team (possibly in conjunction with Punkworks – more on this later) – Searchlights or Microwave

#234 – Kansas City Space Pirates – Solar

#235 – LaserMotive – Laser

#241 – USST – Laser

#253 – UBC Snowstar – Solar

Teams definitely out:

#222 – Starlifters

#226 – MIT Space Elevator Team (again Climber / Power-Beaming only – Tether team will play)

#228 – Team Telsa

#236 – Andromeda Connection

#239 – M Climber

#240 – Lone Star

#242 – Queens Space Elevator Racing Team

#244 – Recens

#245 – Space Elevator Team at UT (University of Tennessee)

Teams I have not heard from:

#221 – Space Invaders

#225 – Team Zero G

#237 – University of Alberta Space Elevator Racing Team

#238 – Uplifting Experience

#243 – Lite Won (Technology Tycoons) – Last year’s second best finisher

#246 – University of Idaho Engineering

#249 – E-T-C (I’m pretty sure they’re playing but haven’t heard from them definitively yet – they might be in transit from Japan)

#250 – Centaurus

I’m disappointed, of course, that not all of the teams can make it, but I’m especially disappointed that neither of the two European entries (Team Telsa and Recens) will be here.  Recens was cursed with tremendously bad luck last year and the Space Elevator Gods should have put this situation aright.  I guess it was not to be.

I’m fairly sure that at least 3-4 entrants from the “Don’t know” list will be playing too, but I won’t move them to the “Definitely in” list until I’m “Definitely sure” 🙂

Both teams listed for the Tether competition (Astroaranaea and MIT) WILL be there.

As I get more replies or information from other sources, I will update this list.

The winnowing continues…

I just received this email from Brian Baca, of the University of Michigan’s MClimber team:

I’m afraid that MClimber will not be ready to compete this year. As usual there are a lot of last minute issues, but we do not have enough time to sort them out along with our classwork and midterms. The team is looking to compete next year, but nothing is official yet.

Major bummer – they did so well in last year’s competition and I was really looking forward to seeing how they were going to do this year.

Let’s hope for their return next year and, as I wrote in my last post, perhaps we’ll see them in both the Climber / Power-Beaming competition and the Tether competition.

Another way to skin the cat?

In last year’s Space Elevator Games Climber / Power-Beaming event, the University of Michigan’s MClimber achieved the distinction of being the first Climber to make it to the top of a competition ribbon.  They are entered again this year, but have been very quiet about what they are going to do (psst – there are no Climbers entered from Appalachian State, so it’s safe 🙂 )

In this article, Engineers from the University of Michigan have come up with this “By mimicking a brick-and-mortar molecular structure found in seashells, University of Michigan researchers created a composite plastic that’s as strong as steel but lighter and transparent.”

The traditional understanding of how carbon nanotubes will be used to construct the Elevator is by weaving or bonding ultra-long fibers together (at least that’s my understanding).  This approach from the U of M is different and may present an alternative way of creating a tether.  Yes, I know, there are issues with doing it this way.  But this is “rev 1” of this approach and it may turn out to have some promise.

And if it does, next year we may see a University of Michigan entrant into both the Climber / Power Beaming event and the Tether event.  Here’s hoping…

How to (really) fix a ribbon

Several days ago, LaserMotive put up an entry on their blog describing a tear that had developed in their test ribbon and asking for people to comment on how they thought it might be fixed.

I wrote on my blog, slightly tongue-in-cheek, that this would be a perfect job for duct tape, but later, on the LaserMotive website, put up my real suggestion (basically sewing it back together).

LaserMotive has now documented how they have fixed this problem.  Click here to see both their temporary and permanent solution.

(Picture from the LaserMotive blog.  Click on it or visit their blog to view a larger version.)

50 years ago today…

October 4, 1957.  50 years ago today.  Russia (excuse me, the Soviet Union) launched Sputnik and, with it, humanity’s first successful step into space.  From Wikipedia:

“The surprise launch of Sputnik 1, coupled with the spectacular failure of the United States’ first two Project Vanguard launch attempts, shocked the United States, which responded with a number of early satellite launches, including Explorer I, Project SCORE, and Courier 1B. The Sputnik crisis also led to the creation of the Advanced Research Projects Agency, DARPA and NASA, and to major increases in U.S. government spending on scientific research and education…Sputnik 1 was launched on October 4, 1957. The satellite was 58 cm (about 23 in) in diameter and weighed approximately 83.6 kg (about 183 lb). Each of its elliptical orbits around the Earth took about 96 minutes. Monitoring of the satellite was done by Amateur radio operators.”

It is impossible to overstate the impact this event has had on humanity.  Other writers, much more talented than I, have waxed poetic about what the launch of Sputnik meant.  Suffice it to say that without it and it’s follow on achievements (and failures), the world would be a much different place, and poorer off, than it is today.

???????????? !!

And today, Google is displaying a modified logo to celebrate this achievement.

(Picture of Sputnik from here – click on it for a larger version)

The field narrows…

In the last few days, two of the teams which had entered the Climber / Power-Beaming event at this year’s Space Elevator Games have announced they will not be competing this year.  Donald Longerbeam’s Starlifters dropped out, citing financial issues, while just today, Michael Harvey and the Andromeda Connection threw in the towel, citing problems in getting solar cells capable of handling their MOLPSol “laser”.

This winnowing out is a normal process; it occurred in both the 2005 and 2006 Space Elevator Games – not every attempt to build and power a Climber is successful.  And it gets harder each year as the requirements continue to become more stringent.

But not to worry; there are several teams who have already demonstrated their teams capabilities and will be competing.  This year’s events will be, by far, the most competitive in the history of the Space Elevator Games.  We’ll be seeing teams using, for the first time, both laser and microwave propulsion systems and we’ll see how quickly this technology is advancing.

But I must say that I hope that the Starlifters will continue to attend our weekly chat session – they were always so cheerful and upbeat and just a joy to be around 🙂

Dates revised for the First European Workshop on Space Elevator Climber and Tether Design

I recently received this email comment from Markus Klettner of EuroSpaceward on my previous post about the dates for the EuroSpaceward workshop being finalized and I thought it was worth it’s own posting:

“Dear Ted

In order to keep you busy (sorry for that) and to respond to requests of university students and young engineers we have advanced the First European Workshop on Space Elevator Climber and Tether Design in Luxembourg to the weekend of November 10-11, 2007.

Find the updated programme in English and French at the website of EuroSpaceward: http://eurospaceward.org/images/workshop-flyer.pdf

The detailed programme of the workshop with the titles of the lectures will be announced later this month..

Kind regards

Markus”

So, (re)mark your calendars.  Wish I could go to this – I’d love to meet the European crowd and see what they’re doing, but I’ll have already been to two Space Elevator events this year.  One more and my wife will divorce me 🙂

The latest from the Kansas City Space Pirates

I received this today from Brian Turner, fearless leader of the Kansas City Space Pirates:

“Well we leave in two weeks! The short time is currently our biggest problem. We have a second trailer so we should have plenty of room. I am attaching a photo of my driveway to give an idea of how much the project has overflowed my garage. Fortunately I live in the county and we can have a bunch of weird stuff all over the lawn. The neighbors are all rooting for us too. Sometimes they stop and ask what is going on.

This weekend I need to get several hundred holes drilled in the mirror frames. So those of you that are local, now is the time that we could use some help. Call me at 816-716-7077. The process is simple and I am planning on having a supervisor for those of you that have not drilled that many holes. Bring a cordless drill if you have one and a 3/16″ bit.

I also am including a photo of what happens on a windy day when we left a mirror tied to something too small.

Cheers
Brian Turner”

(Click on the photos for larger versions)

Three weeks and counting…

Only three more weeks until October 19th and the start of the Space Elevator Games.

If you don’t know what these are, you can find all about them at the Elevator2010 website.

If you want to see a glimpse of the future of transport to and from space, you should plan on attending.  I’ll be live-blogging the games (assuming that the Verizon EVDO service works there 🙂 ) and posting summaries each night.  But it’s no substitute for actually being there, especially if you live in the Salt Lake City area.

Only three more weeks…

Dates finalized for the EuroSpaceward Climber and Tether Design Workshop

In May of this year, EuroSpaceward announced (via Brad Edwards) a workshop to be held in November of this year.  The tentative dates were initially Nov 14-16, but these have now been changed/finalized to Nov 12-14.

Read my original blog posting about this event here and Brad Edwards announcement at the Space Elevator Reference here.

(Thank you Markus Klettner for pointing out the revised dates to me.)

News from the Kansas City Space Pirates

The latest from Brian Turner, fearless leader of the Kansas City Space Pirates:

“Well it’s now less than one month to the competition. We are down to the heavy work of getting ready. If it was still August I would be ecstatic. As it is, I feel quite pressured by time. But all systems are progressing well and we are not expecting any surprises. All of the custom electronics showed up on schedule and that was the last of the potential show-stoppers.

Every test for the last month has been as expected or better. We also will have cool Space Pirate collateral. Including flags, t-shirts, tattoos and mirrors. Speak up if your interested in some of this loot.

Press coverage:

You can find a picture of my garage in the October issue of Kansas City Business Magazine. It’s located just inside the back cover. The magazine should be on sale now. I mistakenly told some of you that this would be in the Kansas City Business Journal. The KC Business Magazine website is KCBcentral.com]

Brian”

Secret weapon revealed for 2008 Space Elevator Games

In this article from NewScientist, we learn about a new possibility in the laser field, a gamma-ray laser.  All you have to do is to (somehow) have “an electron hook up with its antiparticle, the positron, to form positronium” and then have the “positronium atoms merge into a kind-of a ‘super-atom’ condensate” which could then lead to “gamma-ray lasers a million times more powerful than standard lasers”.

No problem…

I fully expect to see at least two of these in next year’s Space Elevator games 🙂

(Picture from here – click on it for a larger version)

The latest Spaceward Foundation News Bulletin

The latest newsletter from Spaceward:

Spaceward Foundation News Bulletin


Newsletter #3 – September 08, 2007


Hello Folks!6 weeks to go, and the excitement is mounting!In this newsletter:

  • Announcements: EuroSpaceward, The Space Show, Hotels, Light Racers
  • Venue pictures and sneak preview
  • 2007 Team Profiles
  • Volunteer positions

Announcements:For those of you new to this newsletter, previous letters are archived at www.spaceward.org/press.html#newsLetters, including the power-beaming technology overview from newsletter #2. This will help you keep up with some of the comments in the team preview below.Fans of Dr. David Livingstone’s Space Show as well as Space Elevator enthusiasts can find our 90 minute SE special conversation with the good doctor here. We talk about the coming games, the Space Elevator, Light Racers, and a little bit about the Space program and Space politics.

A quick reminder on behalf of the European Spaceward Foundation – Registration for the 2007 Climber Workshop in Luxemburg is open – read all about it at www.eurospaceward.org.

Team registration for Light Racers: Welcome to our new team from Farmington. If you’re considering participating in the Great Light Racer Championship, please sign up to the Light Racer mailing list, since we’ll use this list to announce special offers (Solar Panels!) rule updates, practice times, etc. Take a couple of minutes and read through the pages available at www.lightRacers.org. A new picture-by-picture guide to building a Light Racer is available too.

And finally, as if you’ve forgotten, the 2007 Spaceward Games – October 19-21 2007: Be there or be square! For details, tickets, special hotel rates, go to www.spaceward.org. A new hotel rate is now available at the Hilton Garden Inn in Layton (In addition to the Holiday Inn Express next door.) The discounted prices expire about 3 weeks before the games, or if they sell the entire block – so get your tickets now!


Venue Sneak Preview:(Since some email readers do not show images by default, I used links instead of embedded images – just click the image name to view it)I just recently returned from another scouting week in lovely Salt Lake City. Things are coming along great, and I thought I’d share some of the pictures and some of my thoughts with you.

The first image is probably familiar to you already, a Google aerial shot showing the general layout of the grounds. The signature square concrete path will be the epicenter of activity – this is where the climbers will launch from.

The second image is of the launch pad location, taken from where the crane will be located. This year’s crane has an “elbow” type boom, and so will be almost 100′ away from the ribbon, which in my mind makes for a much prettier setup. Still, at almost 400′ tall, even 100′ doesn’t seem like much…

From the launch pad, you can follow the concrete pathway through the lawn to “climber row” – the hangar where the teams are parked when they are not on the pad. Serving as a real life Space Elevator museum, climber row features the climbers hanging from the roof beams at eye level, so you’ll be able to walk up close, talk to the teams, and get a first hand look at what makes them (both the climbers and the teams) tick.

The concrete paths are great for moving the team entries around, and the square pattern allows us to de-stage one team while the other one sets up – No traffic interference. This event center seems to have been built for our games.

Right outside climber row stands this concrete pedestal, which will be transformed (by October 15) into an 8′ Earth hemisphere, complete with Space Elevator attached. This model will also feature the moon, and mars – all to scale!

There is much more that I haven’t snapped pictures of: The question Maze, the A/V facilities where we will screen unique Space Elevator movies, the Light Racer arena, the media center (more on this in the next newsletter)

I will be headed back to SLC in a couple of weeks, and will make sure to have more show and tell for the next newsletter.


The rest of this email is dedicated to an overview of our teams – both the veterans and the newcomers. I recommend that you check out their web sites… You’ll find that the teams are about as diverse a set as we could have hoped for – universities and hobbyists, 4 countries – some are prolific bloggers, some are more secretive. One thing’s for sure: On October 19, all their secrets will be revealed.So here we go, alternating between veteran and newcomers. You’ll notice that not all 22 teams are here. As was the case last year, some teams are not able to complete their climber in time. Since we’re nice people, we allow them to roll over their entry to next year, and so we hope to see them compete yet in 2008.

  • USST – the University of Saskatchewan. (www.usst.ca).
    USST was last year’s best performing team, having come in only two seconds too slow to claim the prize money. This year is a brand new game of course, so while they are natural favorites, they are by no means a hands-down sure bet. Last year, USST was the only team to attempt an Infra-Red power beam, and they are planning to pursue the same idea again this year – only with a much more powerful system in mind. They are ambitious, and are definitely a team to watch. Clayton Ruszkowski is the leader.
  • Lasermotive (www.lasermotive.com).
    This new entry from Seattle is led by Laser expert Jordin Kare, also working with an Infra-Red based system. The Infra-Red systems are closest to what is currently planned for the real Space Elevator – we explained a little bit about the power systems in the previous newsletter. Definitely one of the favorites.
  • The Kansas City Space Pirates (www.kcspacepirates.com).
    The Pirates were by far the most original design last year, and also one of the more powerful ones, pioneering the use of a Solar light collector and what Brian Turner termed “Helio-Beaming”. Look for another original design this year!
  • E-T-C (www.earth-track-controllers.com).
    ETC is our first ever Japanese team! ETC is one of the teams that have chosen to use a commercial off-the-shelf white light beam. Led by Akira Tsuchida.
  • MIT (mitset.mit.edu).
    The Massachusetts Institute of Technology doesn’t join competitions in order to come in second. That’s right – If you’re not first, you’re last! MIT is one of our new entries, and we’re expecting them to uphold the school’s reputation. MIT’s system is based on a Microwave beam, and they have been working on their entry for more than a year, so expect to see sparks fly!
  • Team Zero G(www.teamzerog.com).
    A home grown Microwave-based team, lead by Arthur Shay and assisted by daughter Katie.
  • Team Tesla (www.warr.de/projekte.php?projekt=space_elevator).
    Last year the German team was one of the more robust designs, so if that’s any indication, we’re looking forward to see Team Tesla’s entry. They are pursuing a MW based system, and from their web site they will certainly have this year’s best looking climber! Team leader is Joachim Sturm.
  • The Technology Tycoons. (www.goingupteam.com).
    Known last year as “Lite Won”, this high-school team is another one of the teams using redirected Solar light. Last year’s direct-solar climber performed quite well, and so they have the potential to pull a fast one (get it?) over the grown-up teams. Team leader is Larry Grattan.
  • McGill University (space-elevator.mcgill.ca).
    Another member of the Canadian invasion, McGill is also pursuing a Microwave power beam. Lead by Cyrus Foster.
  • Snowstar (www.snowstar.ca).
    The team from the University of British Columbia is one of our two-year veterans, having fielded entries in both the 2005 and 2006 games. They’re back this year with an all-new Solar based design. Led by Damir Hot, this team is one of the better sponsored teams in the line-up.
  • Starlifters
    A new team this year, featuring a solar design. Led by Donald Longerbeam.
  • Centaurus Aerospace.
    A private team from Logan, Utah, Centaurus is our second two-year veteran. Last year Centaurus we already attempting a Microwave based design, and so they have an extra year’s worth of MW experience under their belts.
  • Andromeda Connection (www.anconn.com).
    A new team this year, featuring a solar design. Led by Mike Harvey
  • University of Michigan MClimber (www.mclimber.org).
    A veteran group, University of Michigan’s MClimber was the first of the climbers to reach the top of the track last year. Lead by Brian Baca, this team is using a white light beam, similar to that of ETC.

Next on our agenda is the “help wanted” sectionWe’re looking for a few good men and women to act as guides – this event will draw on the larger SLC area population, and a lot of people coming to the games will never have heard about the Space Elevator before. (Gasp!) Do you know your Space Elevator basics? Can you explain them well?  We’ve got a “Guide” badge waiting for you!If you feel you’re up for it, please browse to http://www.spaceward.org/help-wanted.html and register, so we can keep you informed. Please also email help-wanted@spaceward.org with a description of what you want to do at the competition.


We look forward to seeing you at the games!   The Spaceward Crew


The Spaceward Foundation is a 501(c)(3) educational non-profit dedicated to furthering Space exploration in educational curriculums and the public mindshare – http://www.spaceward.org.


News from the Kansas City Space Pirates…

I received this email from Brian Turner, fearless leader of the KC Space Pirates:

“Well sometime mistakes are noteworthy enough to admit.

I made a mistake in that I started mixing budget and engineering numbers. I did this a few months back when the budget and the engineering were thoroughly mixed with each other in reality. I took the budget power output numbers and fed them into the engineering worksheet. This caused a fudge factor for motor efficiency to get doubled. I have been working with these numbers for the past few months.

The upside is now that I have corrected the problem it appears that not only do we have enough power. We have enough to be competitive for first place.

The UPS man is stopping by almost daily and the collections of unidentifiable parts in the garage are starting to come together.  Will still need to keep an eye on fund raising as the hotels and gas are a couple of thousand. With that in mind I am announcing the following:

Sale on unsold advertising space. 30% off of ad space less than $1500 and 50% off on the big ones. Plus I am going to offer a commission to other teams to cross market space on each others climbers. That will help advertisers be sure to get their message across. Check our web site for a details.”

“Next stop: Earth Orbit”

In this months US Airways magazine, Kristin Ohlson has written a fine article / overview of the Space Elevator.

She quotes a number of “leading lights” in the field (Dr. Brad Edwards, Ben Shelef, Michael Laine, Ken Davidian, etc.) as well as some “lesser lights” (including yours truly).

It’s a good article – well worth your time to read.

(Sorry for no graphics in this post – I’m on vacation and don’t have my usual web toolkit with me)

News from the McGill Space Elevator Team

One of the first-time entrants in this year’s Space Elevator Games is the McGill Space Elevator Elevator team, from McGill University in Montreal, Canada.  Now I have a special affinity for that town; my wife was born and raised in the Montreal area, most of her relatives live in and around Montreal and she and I were married in Montreal.  Suffice it to say that I have spent a fair amount of time there.

So I was pleased to receive an email yesterday from Cyrus, one of the team members of the McGill Space Elevator Team, informing me that they are in the process of updating their web site and sending me a couple of photos from their teams appearance at Discover McGill, a campuswide orientation for all first-year students at McGill.

This team has been pretty quiet about what type of entry they’re going to have in this years competition and I’ll be contacting them (and all of the other teams) soon to set up some interviews.  In the meantime, enjoy the photos (click on them for a larger version).

(Update 29AUG07 – I inadvertently posted the same picture twice – this is now fixed – sorry)

USST revamps/updates their website

The USST website is sporting a new, updated look – quite spiffy IMHO.  They’ve also been updating their “News” section and we learn from it several interesting things.  Their August 14th update states:

Members of USST have photos taken to be published in “NASA 50”, a publication celebrating the 50th anniversary of NASA.

That’s mega-cool.  Also, their August 22nd entry states:

USST has been unofficially notified by the FAA that they will be approved to operate their laser power source at the Elevator 2010 competition in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Check out their News section for all USST updates.  We also have other confirmation that they will be using a laser to power their Climber this year.  From their website’s Home Page:

For this year’s Elevator: 2010 Competition, the USST is making use of a high-powered laser and we are currently conducting thorough design and testing in order to provide the next generation of beamed power at this years competition.

That makes at least two laser powered entries this year; LaserMotive being the other one.  And, we have the Andromeda Connection’s “Solar Laser” entry, too.  I have no doubt that returning competitors KC Space Pirates, UBC-Snowstar and University of Michigan’s MClimber will all up their game.  Add that to the other first-time entrants and this year’s competition is shaping up to be the most intense yet.  If you haven’t made your plans to be there yet, I’d urge you to do so.  This is an event not to be missed.

“Elevator reaches for the stars”

In today’s edition of the Edmonton Journal, Keith Gerein writes about the University of Alberta’s entry into this year’s Space Elevator Games.  Money quote from team member Chris Ryziuk in discussing their limited budget:

“We can’t buy our way to victory, but a good design goes a long way.”

This is the first article I’ve seen on this team – good to know that they’re active.  They won’t reveal their Climber’s power source so I guess we’ll just have to wait.  You can check out their team website here.

(Photo credit: John Lucas from the Journal.  Click on it or view the article for a larger version)

“Is the Final Frontier Just One Ride Away On a Space Elevator?”

If you are a subscriber to the Wall Street Journal online, you can view today’s article on the Space Elevator by Lee Gomes.  I’m not a subscriber, so won’t be able to view it.  But I’m bummed – I spent a lot of time on the phone with Lee while he was preparing this article – wish I could read it  Oh well.

If anyone is a subscriber, please let me know how the article was 🙂

Update August 27th – This article is now freely available here – thanks to Brian Dunbar at LiftPort for pointing this out.

The Climber/Power Beaming competition and the FAA…

In order to operate their Climber/Power Beaming entries, many of the contestants in this year’s contest must have permission from the FAA.

Bryan Laubscher is the Safety Officer for this event and has issued the following memorandum to all teams;

“1) Solar Teams – Do not have to file anything with the FAA

2) Spotlight Teams – Must file the form below. Richard (FAA advisor) does not anticipate any issues. However, my recommendation to assure passage are:

A) Have a team member designated to look for aircraft and be ready to shut off spotlights.
B) Make the point that the beams are terminated (by the climber). His concern is that distraction or dazzle to an aircraft.
C) Have all your power and divergence information in the form submitted and include the distance at which each beam’s irradiance (Watts / cm squared) drops below the sun’s irradiance.
D) Get this done ASAP.
E) Bring a copy of your form and your approval letter with you to the games as a part of your safety package.

3) Laser Teams – Must file the form below. My recommendation to assure passage are:

A) Have a team member designated to look for aircraft and be ready to shut off the lasers.
B) Explain your system for automatic beam shutoff if the beam strays.
C) Have a person designated at the power switch to shut off the lasers in the case of an unanticpated problems.
D) Make the point that the beams are terminated (by the climber). His concern is eye damage to people on an aircraft.
E) Have all your power and divergence information in the form submitted and include the distance at which each beam’s irradiance (Watts / cm squared) drops below Maximum Permissible Exposure.
F) Get this done ASAP.
E) Bring a copy of your form and your approval letter with you to the games as a part of your safety package.

On the FAA website search for:

Form 7140-1 and for information Advisory Circular AC70-1

This form needs to be filled out by the teams indicated above.”

And on a related note, LaserMotive has announced on their blog that they have already received permission from the FAA to operate their laser-powered climber.  You can read about here.  Congratulations LaserMotive!

News from the Andromeda Connection

The Andromeda Connection has updated their blog (they entitle it “Progress Report”).  The latest news reads, in part;

“It seems the solar laser will be easier and cheaper to build anyway, and the odds of cloud cover during the 3 day event are acceptable. It was therefore decided that a MOLPSoL solar laser would replace the spot lights, providing 6 suns of light energy instead of the original 2 suns expected from the spot lights.”

The man has confidence, no doubt about it.  On his “Why AnConn” page, he states;

“True, there is a lot of competition in this event. Some of this year’s competitors have big names. Some have proven their muster in past events. But given what I have seen from past events, the research I’ve done and my ideas for overcoming the problems mentioned below, there is no doubt in my mind that this year’s competition is in the bag.”

Due to his change in Climber power supply, he also now has some items for sale;

“I have 6 – 2500W/220V long throw spot lights for sale. Asking $1200.00 each, plus shipping. Any takers?”

Their website also has a number of photos and videos on it – definitely worth checking out.  The thumbnail shown on this post is from their gallery and is of the two halves of their drive system.  Click on it for a larger view.

Energy from Space

Longtime readers know that I am very interested in how Solar Power Satellites (SPS) might become a viable option for providing clean energy from space.  According to the calculations I’ve done, it doesn’t seem like a realistic possibility.  The sheer scale of the problem (i.e., how much electricity humanity consumes) means that SPS won’t be more than a minor player on the scene until the efficiencies of Solar-2-Electric conversion get better by at least an order of magnitude (or more).

But I still try and follow developments in this field, hoping for some new breakthrough (or hoping that I’ve misplaced a decimal point somewhere).  In a recent issue of Marc Boucher’s SpaceRef Daily, he points out a presentation which was given at the George C. Marshall Institute titled “Energy from Space: Examining the Potential of Space to Provide Energy for Earth“.  Although I didn’t attend this, the slides from the two presentations are on the Marshall Institute website (and are available here and here).

Space Elevator fans might take note of slide number 13 from Dr. Hoffert’s presentation.  He uses a comparison from Ivan Bekey’s Advanced Space System Concepts and Technologies showing an earth-based Space Elevator operating “40-50 years out” and it’s launch cost as $2/kg (vs. $20,000/kg using a Shuttle today).  He also makes the case that SPS could eventually be cheaper than earth based Solar power because of the increased efficiencies.

Neither presentation, unfortunately, deflates the argument I made earlier; that because of the sheer size of the problem, SPS will not be a major contributor to earth’s power usage unless and until efficiencies get a whole let better.

Interesting presentations nonetheless…

Kansas City Space Pirates start blog

Taking up the challenge offered by LaserMotive, the KC Space Pirates have updated their web site with a blog.  Their latest posting is titled “Its a great day to be a Space Pirate”.

Dan Leafblad from the Space Pirates has this to say about the blog:

“Hi, We have been working hard testing and preparing for the competition but also accepted LaserMotive’s challenge to start a blog, something we have been planning on for months but just now got around to doing. we hope to update it regularly, i dont know how often it will be but we hope to keep it updated.”

Their website is very interesting and is one of the better Team sites out there.  Take a look…

Note to other teams – wanna buy some equipment?

I received this news today from Clayton Ruszkowski, captain of the USST Space Design Team:

“…we are putting our 1kW laser stack, highly reflective mirror and solar cells (GaAs) up for sale to the other teams. They will be posted on our new and updated website next week…if anyone is interested to contact me via my email address; usst [AT] usask.ca…”

Clayton has emailed me some pictures of the stuff for sale (here and here – both are 1mb files).  So, either USST has given up or has upgraded.  I would lay a large amount of cash on the latter.  They are also sporting the spiffy new logo shown on this post (click on it for a high-res version).

Finally, Clayton and I have also entered into “serious discussions” on what type of Canadian beer may be brought to yours truly… 🙂  You know, I wonder if I could talk the German, Japanese and Spanish teams into bringing along a six-pack or two…

The Canadians are coming! The Canadians are coming!

In this year’s Space Elevator Games, no fewer than five teams from Canada have entered the Climber/Power Beaming competition.  Returning from last year are teams from the University of Saskatchewan (USST) and from the University of British Columbia (Snowstar).  New Canadian entries this year include the McGill Space Elevator Team (from McGill University in Montreal, Quebec), the Queens Space Elevator Team (from Queens University in Kingston, Ontario) and the University of Alberta Space Elevator Racing Team (from the University of Alberta in Edmonton).

USST has to be considered the early favorite for this competition.  They finished first in the competitions in 2005 and 2006 and missed out on the prize money last year by just two seconds.

I’m personally very glad that we have so many entries from north of the border.  My wife is a Canadian citizen so fully half of my extended family are Canucks.  In addition, this land of Moose, Hockey, and Mounted Police brews a plethora of fine beer.  Now, I’m an American and I love my country (and my beer), but it is my personal opinion that most American beers are not up to world standards.  So, I would take it as a very great personal favor if each of the teams would bring yours truly a six-pack of their favorite brew.  If you do, I promise to reimburse you in American or Canadian dollars and to post a very favorable story about your team 🙂

CBC news, a Canadian news organization which did a fine job of covering the games last year, has posted a story about this year’s Canadian invasion of the games.

A story from last year’s Space Elevator Games…

One of the entrants in last year’s Space Elevator Games was LiteWon, a team made up of High School students from Westmont High School located in Campbell, CA.  Their climber, certainly the least complicated one there, came up with the second best time to the top (a little over two minutes), losing out only to USST.  This year, they are returning for another crack at the prize.

A story ran in the November 1st, 2006 issue of the Campbell Reporter, one I hadn’t seen until Ben Shelef emailed it to me a few days ago.  It really is well done and the photographs are wonderful.  The author, Alicia Upano, did a marvelous job.  My favorite fact from the story was that their climber was powered by a motor from a model airplane.

If you want to see the story photos in all their glory, click on this link to view the pdf of the story.  Though this pdf file is large (2 MB), it is well, worth the time it will take to download on your machine (IMHO).

(Photo credit: Jacqueline Ramseyer – click on it for a larger version.  There are also several other excellent photos in the story)

8 degrees spells trouble for Solar power teams…

Salt Lake City, the home of this year’s Space Elevator Games, is at latitude 40 degrees 47 minutes north while Las Cruces, home of last year’s Games is at latitude 32 degrees 31 minutes north.  The difference is only a little more than 8 degrees, but that, according to Brian Turner of the Kansas City Space Pirates, spells out about a 15% power loss for their climber.  Brian also says that Salt Lake City is cloudy about 45% of the time vs. 20% for Las Cruces.  Added up, this spells some additional hurdles for the Space Pirates climber, and any other team relying on Solar Power.

The Space Pirates are also experiencing other difficulties.  From an email he recently sent out (and reprinted with permission);

“Solar cell attrition is looking to be a potential problem. We are using Space Grade rejects. The testing has been mixed with both good and bad results. It appears that we will break more than I had anticipated because they are quite fragile. It also seems at this point that some of the Space Grade rejects are also Space Pirate rejects. Currently it looks like we may have to scrap 30% of what we buy or use them at reduced output.”

Brian also has this to say about his competitors:

“None of the other teams seem to be confident enough in their progress to release any details. That usually means that they are having similar problems to us. If any of the laser teams were really doing well I would expect to hear something. The teams that are copying my mirror idea are up against the same things we are. And as for the Microwave teams…. Well, I am just not a believer.”

I’m not sure if the other teams not releasing information is symptomatic of problems or not.  He certainly could be right, but I expect at least a few other teams to come to the competition with polished, ready Climbers and they are only keeping mum now out of fear of tipping their hand early.  Come October, we’ll find out…

The Space Pirates are also sporting a new logo.  Click on it to see a larger version.

Happy Birthday NASA!

49 years ago today, President Dwight David Eisenhower signed The National Aeronautics and Space Act (Pub.L. 85-568) to create The National Aeronautics and Space Agency, more commonly known as NASA.  NASA was created to respond to the challenge of Sputnik.

Though this agency is often criticized, it’s monumental achievements cannot be overlooked.  In addition to winning the race to the moon via its Mercury and Apollo programs, NASA has sent probes all over the solar system and into true outer space.  Today, NASA’s Rovers wander the surface of Mars, looking for the building blocks of life.  NASA built and launched Skylab and is now working on the International Space Station.  It has launched numerous satellites that have performed spectacularly, perhaps best symbolized by the Hubble Telescope.  It has built the Shuttle, the world’s only, true, spaceship; capable of launching into space (with a 20 ton payload) and returning.   And for we Space Elevator afficiandos, let’s not forget that NASA provided the money for Dr. Edwards research which led to the Space Elevator concept we are all working for, not to mention the prize money for the Space Elevator Games. The list of accomplishments goes on and on.

Yes there have been mistakes and failures and people have criticized NASA (perhaps justly, perhaps not) for supposedly taking wrong paths with the ISS and the Shuttle.  But NASA is an organization which actually accomplishes great and magnificent things.  We take so much of what they do now for granted and we really shouldn’t.  Space is hard.

There is little doubt that NASA is going through perhaps their most difficult time now.  From constantly changing priorities, to personnel issues that have become soap-opera fodder, to trying to deal with the nascent commercialization of space, it sometimes seems now like they are in a lose-lose situation.  But I think we have to step back and take a look at the larger picture and just marvel at what they have actually accomplished and what they continue to do.

Next year is NASA’s fiftieth anniversary and I hope that day is marked by our country with great joy and celebration.

Happy Birthday NASA!  Long may you continue to ad astra per aspera.

Close(r), but no cigar…

When I first read this article, my thoughts were “Wow!  Has the ribbon problem finally been solved?”  The specific line that made me think this was;

“Now, a research team from Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, has assembled particles of graphene oxide, a form of graphite and a cousin of diamonds, into very thin sheets that ARE EVEN STRONGER THAN THOSE OF THE [CARBON] NANOTUBES.”  (emphasis mine)

But wait, how can this be?  I thought carbon nanotubes were theoretically the strongest material possible.

Then the article said;

“Laboratory tests showed that the grapheme paper was as strong as that made from carbon nanotubes…”

Wait.  First its “even stronger”, then its “as strong as”.  ???  I guess they’re picking and choosing what kind of carbon nanotubes to compare it with (and then changing that on the fly).

The accompanying abstract gave some real numbers to look at; the strength of this new graphene oxide paper is given as 32 GPa.  Very strong indeed, nearly 8 times as strong as steel, but, alas, not strong enough for an earth-based Space Elevator (130 GPa needed for a factor of two safety margin – Edwards).

Still, a very impressive accomplishment indeed.  If/once the water solubility issue is solved, this stuff will be used in all sorts of applications.  They could even make mail envelopes out of it; lets see the post office try and mangle those…

(Photo credit: Northwestern University.  Click on it or visit the articles to view a larger version)

Update July 29th – I’ve heard from a couple of people that not all GPa’s are the same, and that this stuff isn’t that strong at all.  Please note Tom Nugent’s comment on this post…

Updates from LaserMotive

There have been a couple of posts recently (here and here) on the LaserMotive blog, both concerning the mirror that they’re going to be using in the upcoming Space Elevator Games.

In the latest post, they include a cool photograph, showing a reflection of someone from the coated side of their mirror, and discussing why they’re not concerned that their mirror doesn’t reflect visible light very well.

I must say, of all the Space Elevator Team websites, only a few are updated frequently.  I understand that it takes extra work to keep a blog updated (well I know) and a lot of teams just don’t have the extra bandwidth to do this.  Also, I’m sure that some teams are worried about giving too much away to the competition.  With a half-million bucks at state, it’s hard to fault that logic.  But I hope that the other teams will start posting some updates on their blogs soon, otherwise I’m going to have to subject them to one of my infamous interviews 🙂

(Click on the picture thumbnail, or check out the LaserMotive post, for a larger version)

“Elevator Games Aim High”

The press release, announcing the date and venue of this year’s Space Elevator Games is all over the media and blogosphere now, and I’m not going to attempt to link to all of the related posts.

I will make an exception for Alan Boyle’s Cosmic Log, however.  His column is a regular read of mine; I always enjoy what he has to say.  Here is his take on the upcoming festivities…

Date and Venue announced for 2007 Space Elevator Games

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., July 25 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The Spaceward Foundation announced today the venue and timing for its annual Space Elevator games.

The event will be held at the Davis County Event Center just outside of Salt Lake City, Utah. The qualifying rounds will start on October 15, and the event will be open to the public between October 19 and October 21.

The Space Elevator competitions, marking their third year running, will feature more than 20 teams from around the country and the world, vying for $1,000,000 in cash prizes provided by NASA’s Centennial Challenges program.

“The Utah Governor’s Office of Economic Development is thrilled to have the Spaceward Games in Utah this year,” said Gary Harter, Managing Director of Business Creation there. Barbara Riddle, director of the Davis area conventions shared his enthusiasm.

This year will feature a new technology competition — “Light Racers” — that allows kids and young adults to take part in a realistic lunar exploration scenario and win cash prizes for their performance. The competition is open to school, family, and grown-up teams. The Light Racers also serve as a science education platform for teaching basic science and math topics.

Meekk Shelef, president of the Spaceward Foundation: “We are thrilled to have added an educational component where kids can take part in the competition. Reaching out to the scientists and engineers of the future is the most important thing we can do.”

The Space Elevator games concentrate on two far-reaching technology concepts that will enable NASA to enhance its space program — power beaming for wireless power transfer, and Nano-materials such as Carbon Nanotubes for strong structures.

Ken Davidian, program manager for Centennial Challenges: “I am excited and impressed with the evolution and level of technical maturity demonstrated by the teams in both the Tether and Beam Power Challenges. Over the past 24 months, individual teams started from scratch, have grown continually, have coalesced into communities, and are on the verge of accomplishing substantial achievements worthy of a Centennial Challenges prize.”

Dr. Bradley C Edwards, the leading Space Elevator researcher and science advisor to the games: “The Space Elevator games, with their emphasis on strong tethers and power beaming, represent the road to building the Space Elevator. We hope their cumulative effect on the engineering community will enable further effort in this direction.”

“From what we have seen of the teams so far, we are looking forward to an exciting race to the finish this year,” said Ben Shelef, CEO of the Spaceward Foundation. “Third year’s a charm — we expect to be able to award the prize purse this year.”

The Space Elevator is a revolutionary Earth-to-Space transportation system proposed in 1960 by Yuri Artsutanov and enhanced in 2000 by Dr. Bradley Edwards, then at Los Alamos National Labs. The system is comprised of a stationary cable rotating in unison with the Earth, with one end anchored to the surface of the planet and the other end in space. Electric cars then travel up and down the cable, carrying cargo and people.

For more information on the competitions, visit: http://www.spaceward.org/, email ted [AT] spaceward.org, or call (630) 240-4797.

Press resources are located at http://www.spaceward.org/press/PR-2007-001.html.

The Spaceward Foundation is a public-funds non-profit organization dedicated to furthering space science and technology in the public mindshare and in educational curriculums. We believe that expanding mankind’s habitat is essential to its survival, and that the most effective way to induce long- term change is through education. Spaceward Foundation

CONTACT: Ted Semon of Spaceward Foundation, +1-630-240-4797, ted [AT] spaceward.org

Web site: http://www.spaceward.org/

New life for LiftPort?

In his post “A Boost from Balloons?” on his Cosmic Log, Alan Boyle details the possibilities that LiftPort may have in using it’s Tethered Tower application to stay afloat (pun intended).  Alan talks about his conversations with LiftPort’s Michael Laine and their latest demo (the preparation of which was described somewhat painfully here).

LiftPort/Tethered Towers may have one or more potential customers for this product and that may be enough for them to stay solvent and continue on their quest to build a Space Elevator.  Let’s hope so…

More on the Japan Space Elevator Association

Today I heard back from Mr. Shiuchi Ohno, one of the founders of the newly formed Japan Space Elevator Association (JSEA).  I had emailed them a few questions – here are his responses;

Q) How long has JSEA been in existence?
A) JSEA is an association just born in this month. We will have first meeting this weekend in Tokyo.  Last year, my friend and I went to Seattle to meet Mr.Michael and Mr. Tomas of Liftport company. We proposed them to start Japanese branch. But they couldn’t decide until now. Then we decided to start actual activity in Japan for the real SE.

Q) What kind of organization is it?  Academic only? General Interest?  Governmental?
A) At first, our activity will stay within general interest. But we are very conscious of academic study and commercial based research and development. We want to make effort to speed them up.

Q) What is the organizations charter?  Are they an information-only group or are they going to actively try and help build a Space Elevator.
A) We have not actual strategy for charter yet. (That’s the theme for this weekend meeting.) One idea for this is to be continuing private organization and found some companies that obey associate’s principles. Those companies will concentrate to build a SE.

So, there you have it.  Mr. Ohno has told me he will email me periodically with updates from the JSEA and I will certainly pass them along as I receive them.

I’ve added a link to their website on the Blogroll section of my sidebar.  Though it is almost all in Japanese, plugging the Japanese text into Babelfish gives a good enough translation to figure out what they are talking about (thanks, Brian, for the tip on Babelfish).

Japan Space Elevator Association

No, I didn’t know that there was one either.  I cannot read Japanese, and there’s no English translation.

I found it via a link on the E-T-C Space Elevator Team website.  It seems that the team will be making a presentation to the Japan Space Elevator Association (JSEA) on July 28th.  I’ll contact their team captain to try and find out how organized the JSEA is and what we might be hearing from them in the future…

I would LOVE IT if the Japanese got into this in a big way.  Here’s a country with the technical know-how, the resources and the balls to pull this off.  And, my wife is of Japanese ancestry – maybe I can use that connection to wangle a ride 🙂

Anniversary of Moon Landing

On this date, 38 years ago, mankind put it’s first footprints on another world (even though the conspiracy theorists think it was all staged).

Yes, it’s only distantly related to a Space Elevator (at least for now), but it’s still worth a note.  Someday, many of us will take the first steps of our journey to the Moon on a Space Elevator…

RussiaToday looks at Space Elevators

The first half of this 25 minute long YouTube video (originally from RussiaToday) is devoted to nanotechnology and Russia’s move into this field of research.  Just after the video’s 10 minute mark, the narrator talks about how carbon nanotubes might be used to build an earth-based Space Elevator.  He theorizes that the climbers might be powered via Solar Energy (rather than ground-based lasers) or that the cable itself might be able to conduct power for the climbers.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-TdY2RxgW4[/youtube]

“Reconverging Technologies: Space, Nano, and Fountains of Paradise”

The Society for the History Of Technology (SHOT) will be holding it’s annual meeting in Washington, D.C. in October of this year.  SHOT is an organization dedicated to:

“…the historical study of technology and its relations with politics, economics, labor, business, the environment, public policy, science, and the arts.”

This year, Professor W. Patrick McCray will be presenting a paper entitled “Reconverging Technologies: Space, Nano, and Fountains of Paradise”.  The paper’s abtract states:

“Central to the plot of Arthur C. Clarke’s 1978 book ‘The Fountains of Paradise’ is the concept of a space elevator. His book appeared at a time of renewed international interest in space exploration and space colonization. Within a few years, however, pro-space advocates like K. Eric Drexler turned their attention to promoting nanotechnologies and molecular manufacturing. While Clarke’s vision was, of course, never realized, his idea of a space elevator gained renewed life following the widespread scientific attention paid to novel carbon nanostructures in the 1980s and 1990s. While still in a liminal state that blends fantasy and actual engineering studies, proposals for a space elevator resemble the visionary engineering analyses that marked the early Space Age. This paper explores the reconvergence of space exploration and nanotechnology as witnessed by the interest in space elevator technologies and the engineers advocating them.”

Too bad another event is going to be going on at the same time or I might want to attend 🙂  I’m sure the papers will be published afterwards…

Updates from LiftPort

Over a dozen posts have been put up on the LiftPort blog in the past few days.  Rather than summarize each one of them, I recommend that you just link over to the most recent post (here) and then just work your way backwards through the preceding posts.

Many of the posts have to do with LiftPort photos posted on flickr and comments on their ongoing legal issues.  But the post titled LiftPort’s Tethered Towers, Trials and Triumph: Part 1 conclusion deserves special mention.  Now, I’m a Systems guy from way back.  I’ve seen the good, the bad and the ugly with designing Systems and putting them together, and I’ve contributed to each at various times.  But I don’t recall participating in a demo as trouble-plagued as the one summarized in this LiftPort post.  If I was in this writer’s shoes, I’d have been seriously dependent on Prozac by the time this demo was completed.  It’s a miracle they got it working at all.

Read it and weep…

News from RAMCO I

One of the entrants in this year’s Space Elevator Games is Warr’s RAMCO I, out of Munich, Germany.  They do post news on their website, but I don’t read German.  If you plug the latest news entry from them into one of those online language translators, you get the following:

“The WARRmedia WARR-EX1 was updated with pictures by the Garnix to festival and the test ignition. A lot of fun with it!”

There is also a video, which looks somewhat like what I saw in my neighbor’s backyard on the Fourth of July…

Giant Carbon Dioxide Vacuums

Several weeks ago, I wroteabout technologies available / hoped for on getting rid of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) in our atmosphere.  There are a lot of reasons why a Space Elevator “evacuator” would not be practical to use to accomplish this; separating the CO2 from the atmosphere without generating more CO2, pumping it up a “Space Elevator Tube”, gravity pulling it back down into the atmosphere, etc.  In addition, I wonder if we really want to get rid of this stuff – there might come a day when we really need it and we’ll wish we hadn’t thrown it away.

It appears though, that at least one of these problems may be solved.  In this article, the authors announce a technology which will separate CO2 from the atmosphere, and do so with materials that can continually be recycled.  They use standard forms of energy to accomplish this (with the accompanying pollution), but this can be solved by powering this unit with Solar cells, making this a really clean way to get CO2 out of the atmosphere.  The problem, of course, is what do you do with it then.  It’s only stable in a gas form (having already been removed from it’s stable liquid (oil) form or stable solid (coal) form).  You’d have to compress the bejesus out of it – into something like degenerate matter.  Then you could use a Space Elevator to haul it out of the atmosphere and, as a bonus, send it to someplace that could use it (like the moon or Mars).  This would help those bodies develop an atmosphere.  Of course without a magnetic field to protect the life on the body, it probably couldn’t develop in a non-protected manner, but I’ll leave the solution of that problem as an exercise for the reader.

And yes, this post only has a tenuous link to a Space Elevator, but like many others, I’m waiting for the official announcement of the upcoming Space Elevator Games too…

Anyway, the article makes for interesting reading and there is also a link to a video on the post which shows the unit in action.

Space Elevator Presentation from Live Video

This is a generally well-constructed presentation about the possibilities of a Space Elevator, combining many of the SE images floating around the Internet along with pictures from last year’s Space Elevator Games.  They mangled the Carl Sagan quote, and stated (incorrectly, unfortunately) that NASA was interested in the idea of a Space Elevator, but other than that, it was well done.

Based on a comment made in the presentation, about how the Space Elevator Games, with $150K in Prize Money had occurred “earlier this month”, I have to conclude this was posted in October of last year.  However, it just popped up in my Search Engines so I’m linking to it now.

(Update: 16 July, 2007 – The video no longer appears on the website.  However, it is now available via YouTube)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StQMxdQ2RGE[/youtube]

Telstar 1 launched 45 years ago today

Telstar 1, the world’s first active communication satellite, and also a product of the world’s first privately-sponsored space launch, was launched on this date in 1962.  It’s hard to believe that we’ve only had this capability for 45 years.  My kids have no idea what a world without this technology is like – just another sign of how old I’m getting, I guess.

I remember the excitement that surrounded the launch and how my dad and I and the neighbors would go outside at night when a pass was scheduled to be visible to see if we could spot it – often times we could.

The ties between Telstar 1 and a future Space Elevator are many:

  • Communications satellites were the brainchild of Sir Arthur C. Clarke, also the author of The Fountains of Paradise, the Sci-fi book which popularized the concept of Space Elevators.
  • Reducing the cost of satellite launches will be a major reason that a Space Elevator will be built.
  • The launch of Telstar 1 ushered in the age of privately-sponsored Space launches, and my money is on private enterprise to build the first Space Elevator.

The Wikipedia article on Telstar 1 makes for fascinating reading.

(Photo from Wikipedia – click on it for a larger version)

Snowstar update

On the Team Snowstar website, they give a progress report on how/what they are doing, along with some neat photos.  The photo of their climber on a 40 foot tether shows that, on the outside at least, they have a similar design to last year’s entry (though of course there may be changes between now and competition day).

In their latest posting (June 27th), they note:

“In addition to progress on this year’s design, on June 5 we ran the climber in a situation that allowed us to test in real-world conditions, allowing us to refine and verify our design. There are no public test days planned in the near future; however, UBC Snowstar is proud to announce that we will be holding an event on July 21 at Science World. More details will be forthcoming, with instructions on how to get there as the day comes closer.”

Check out their website for more information.

$34,000 = cost to lift one 1kg from earth to the vicinity of Mars

In this post on the Space Elevator Reference, Dr. Bryan Laubscher discusses what it will cost to lift 1kg from the surface of earth to the vicinity of Mars using rocket technology.   Dr. Laubscher asks (and answers) the question:

“My question is: How much exploration, especially manned exploration, of the moon and Mars will we be doing at $34,000 per kilogram? My guess is that we’ll do pretty much what we’ve done over the last 35 years since the last Apollo mission.”

Dr. Laubscher makes a compelling, cost-justified case for a Space Elevator.  Too bad “the concept is not of interest to NASA.”

My money is still on a US business-consortium or a joint venture between Dubai and India to build the first, earth-based Space Elevator…

In a related article, “How to Get to Space – cheap“, Andrey Kobilnyk gives the cost of lifting 1kg from the surface of the earth to LEO ad $19,000.  Dr. Laubscher had given this cost as $10,000.  If Mr. Kobilnyk is correct, then it costs even more to lift one 1kg from earth to the vicinity of Mars.  He, too, argues that a Space Elevator, built from carbon nanotubes, would be a much more cost-effective way to solve this problem…

(Money Graphic courtesy of Money Clip Art Gallery.  Rotating nanotube graphic from FirstScience.com)

Call for organizers for the 2008 Space Elevator Conference

The Space Elevator Reference today announced a call for organizers for the 2008 Space Elevator Conference, expected to be hosted in Seattle, Washington.  From the announcement;

“The purpose of the conference is to bring together scientists, engineers, businessmen, economists, educators, financiers, writers, students and others interested in the Space Elevator for wide-ranging papers and discussion sessions…We are looking for individuals local to Seattle, in the United States and abroad with a deep interest in the Space Elevator and a desire to organize and attend the conference.”

Check out the post for more information.  If you are interested in furthering the “cause” of building a Space Elevator, here’s a good way to get involved.

Spider silk, goats, and the Space Elevator Games

As ScienCentralNews reports, spider silk is strong stuff, “5 times tougher than Kevlar.”  But as they also report in this very interesting article, it’s hard to obtain, in quantity, from spiders.  The story describes a technique of harvesting spider silk from Goat milk.  The idea was to insert gene fragments into goats and then harvest the silk spider from the goat’s milk.

One of the entrants in the 2006 Space Elevator Games Tether Pull competition was a Canadian company called Nexia Biotechnologies.  They licensed this technology and attempted to create a super-strong tether to enter into the Games.  They never showed up to compete, however, and I always wondered why.  This article gives us the probable reason; the spider silk created from this technique was inferior to the real stuff.

A newer technique, using the entire gene sequence of spider silk (instead of just a fraction of it, as was done before) may be in the offing, and this time, instead of splicing this information into goats, it may be spliced into crops.  Cheryl Hayashi, one of the team members who has helped decode the entire spider silk gene sequence states; “That way they could be grown very cheaply, you know, by the acre. And then the silk protein would be extracted from the plant material and this would be the way that we could get very large amounts of spider silks. We could get spider silks by the ton.”

There is also a video about spider silk and spider silk “farming” you can view.  One learns that Black Widow spiders happen to be the best for this use.  Nadia Ayoub, the researcher interviewed, said that farming Black Widows to extract Spider silk was like “farming wolves for meat” – a very interesting comparison.

It’s a shame that spider silk is not strong enough for an earth-based space elevator, but it should work just fine for a lunar-based one.  Here’s hoping this technique becomes practical.