Regular readers of this blog or those that follow the goings-on at the Spaceward site know that TRUMPF decided to help out, big-time, in the upcoming Space Elevator Games. This is well-summarized on the Spaceward web site:
“We’re thrilled to announce that Laser tool manufacturer TRUMPF has stepped forward with a lucrative offer to support teams with its state-of-the-art laser equipment.
Being the world leader in laser technology, TRUMPF took a natural interest in the power beaming games, and is providing both hardware and expertise to enable the 1-km climb.”
I have posed several questions to TRUMPFlger Schlueter about the technology, the upcoming games and TRUMPF’s goals. He (and Dave Marcotte, also of TRUMPF) have kindly answered. Note that if you are unable to read all of the slides or the table, you can click on them for a larger version.
Space Elevator Blog [SEB] – I noticed that in the current issue of “Laser Community” (http://www.trumpf-laser.com/208.img-cust/Laser_Community_03-2007_en.pdf), a TRUMPF publication, the last page states the following: “100,000 Kilometers: Across this distance, laser beams may one day power the motors of the so-called Space Elevator…” Before last year’s Space Elevator Games, were you aware of the concept of the Space Elevator? If so, how did you learn about it?
Holger Schlueter [HS]– Hello Ted ! TRUMPF is a big, multinational company – I actually saw the laser community magazine for the first time yesterday. I was as surprised as you. TRUMPF in Germany was obviously as intrigued by the space elevator concept as we were here in the United States. Maybe they had read the same Spiegel Online article that I had read. Well, anyways, end of October I sent Ben a message with a terribly faulty calculation claiming the space elevator would never work because of the beam divergence. Ben, being the nice and courteous person he is, wrote back friendly and humbly pointed out the embarrasing mistake I had made. So I did the calculation again and realized you actually can transmit a multi-kW laser beam several hundred thousand km into space with manageable divergence. So I repented 😉 and a very good relationship with Ben began.
Did I know about the space elevator before? Faintly in the back of my head I recollect something about the Space Elevator, but I always put it into the realm of impossible science fiction because it seemed so infeasible to me.
[SEB]– What do you think of the idea of a Space Elevator and do you think that TRUMPF equipment can play a key part in its construction?
[HS] – Well, the two big obstacles are:
- Beam divergence and control of multi-kW beams – after correcting the calculation it seems very feasible to me that lasers can provide the necessary 1000 kW class beam with the necessary beam quality.
- Tether strength – I don’t understand much about it – but it seems the teams around the world are making great progress.
As a laser source you have several different options:
- Diode lasers
- CO2 lasers
- Diode pumped solid state lasers – here you have basically another three options – see slide:
.
In evaluating the beam sources there are many aspects to consider, for instance: Power, Scalability, Beam divergence, Efficiency, Wavelength, Receiver efficiency.
Here is a compilation of currently relevant laser technologies:
.
Beam quality and Brightness: Power scalability itself is not the important aspect – it is important to be able to increase the power without changing the beam quality of the beam (for TRUE power scalability see: http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3987v1). Beam quality is measured as half the beam divergence times the beam radius (units: mm mrad) and tells you for a given beam diameter the divergence of the beam. Beam quality cannot be improved using passive optical elements without reducing the power of the beam. In other words: The brightness (Power per steradian) of a beam source cannot be increased using passive optical elements. This is VERY important for the space elevator, since we want to shoot the beam at a receiver that can be up to 100,000 km away. Ben tells me, one needs full power on the elevator up to a distance of 6,000km then a portion of the beam is good enough. I have to believe him there. So, taking these numbers you have for instance for the available Disk laser: 10 kW with 8 mm mrad beam divergence with a (hypothetical) laser aperture of 10 m diameter sending the beam space ward (I chose 10m as it represents todays largest optical telescope apertures, for instance Keck Observatory in Hawaii – you need diffraction limited optical performance on the sending end – therefore this seems a good comparison to me). In this case the beam grows with a divergence of 1.6e-3 mrad (8 mm mrad / 5000 mm) – the radius therefore grows by 1.6mm for every km – 9600 mm in 6,000km distance. The entire beam therefore has a diameter of 30 m (2 x 9.6m+10m) in 6,000 km distance. That seems quite feasible to me for a space craft as the receiver does not have to be diffraction limited, it only requires the size.
By building more advanced resonators we can filter higher order modes in the disk laser and achieve 12 kW with 1 mm mrad (This is a hero results that was actually achieved in government lab). That already gives us a beam size of 12,4m instead of 30m!
In order to now scale this power to 100 or even 1000kW the thin disk laser gives us several options (from now on I only talk hypothetically and about hero results):
- We can currently extract 7 kW per disk and can put 4 disks optically in series – that should allow us eventually to achieve 28 kW at 1 mm mrad – putting disk in one resonator in series does not decrease the beam quality.
- We can wavelength combine at least 4 different wavelength into a 28 kW x 4 = 112 kW of the same beam quality (since you can superimpose beams of different wavelength without deteriorating the beam quality – called wavelength multiplexing).
This gives us – quite feasible in the next 5 years – 112 kW at 1 mm mrad.
If we would now install 10 separate beam stations that would track the space elevator with a gimble system we can achieve 1000 kW beam with TODAYS’ technology!
BUT NOW TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION:
The most important property of the Thin Disk Laser is its ability to be scaled into the 100 kW regime without sacrificing beam quality. This is the major advantage the Thin Disk Geometry has over the fiber geometry for the space elevator project. For an exact definition of power scalability see the following article: http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3987v1. In this slide you can see that limitations on the scalability of the disk concept to power becomes relevant only at 100 kW per disk or more.
.
Another big obstacle will be the receiver efficiency at the different wavelengths.
- Diodes have an advantage since their emission wavelength can be tailored to match maximum quantum efficiency of the receiver material and they are they might even allow the usage of Si as the receiver material. TRUMPF has a diode laser factory near Princeton, New Jersey – I was their GM for three years – and I can see possible advances with super high brightness diodes and dense wavelength multiplexing that might make this another good contender for the beam source of a real elevator.
- CO2 lasers emit at 10.6 um – there is no direct conversion using the photoelectric effect feasible – therefore you would need a thermoelectric conversion process, for instance a sterling engine could be used.
- The diode pumped solid state lasers (Disk, Fiber, Rod) emit beyond the fundamental absorption line of Si and therefore need Ge receivers or even ATJ (advanced triple junction – three different receiver types on top of each other) (see the graph below and the white paper link below):
.
Excerpt from http://www.emcore.com/assets/photovoltaics/Emcore_Manuscript_Fatemi_3P-B5-03_WCPEC-3.pdf.
Ben should tell you some more about the finite efficiency of all receivers, as this will provide maybe the THIRD large challenge for the space elevator project – how do you actually remove the excess heat in space that stems from the limited efficiency of any such receiver. And the heat generated may be substantial: Imagine a 1000 kW beam converted with 80% efficiency – you still have to cool 200 kW – how do you do that in vacuum?
[SEB] – What are you offering this year to teams who want to use your equipment?
[HS]– We have promised to offer at least a 8 kW TruDisk laser with 8 mm mrad. This laser is fiber delivered and the teams would have to interface into our safety system and our fiber delivery receptacle. We can provide all the necessary documentation and components for the teams. They will also get enough test time at our or our partners labs. The project leader for the actual interaction with the teams is Dave Marcotte, our national head of the service and training organization – he is a space enthusiast himself I would like you to ask him directly about the exact deliverables of TRUMPF.
Dave Marcotte [DM]– We look forward to assisting the groups as they progress. We are estimating the need for 4 “hot laser” testing opportunities for each team at intermediate points in the development process. We also plan to have a “dress rehersal” before the big competition. TRUMPF and the teams will need to work together on the “design of test” for each phase. We have highly knowledgeable people in our Service Group, Product Management and R&D who can be referenced for insight on laser technology, optics, interfacing, safety and integrated systems.
[SEB]– I understand that TRUMPF will be interviewing contestants in this year’s Space Elevator Games at the upcoming Photonics West Trade Show. What are you going to be looking for?
[DM]– Difficult question. Basically, I feel key elements of a successful development project are knowledge, organization, attitude and resources. We will consider the skill set of the group and how the players are presented as a knowledge base. We will consider the proposed approach to solving the problem, more than the hypothetical solution. An organized project plan with a best guess on which skills will be utilized is important to pulling the various technologies together into an integrated solution. Frequently I have seen attitude as a defining difference when presented with development frustrations and failures encountered by individual members and the team. There is a saying… something like…. “Inspiration vs Perspiration”. Available resources are unfortunately not connected to knowledge, organization and attitude. I have seen great guys, who work together seamlessly, but without resources (hardware, software, time, space…) they are starved and unable to demonstrate success. The resources the group brings to the table will complete TRUMPF’s contribution.
[SEB] – Are you planning on attending the Space Elevator Games this year?
[HS] – Absolutely & I hope to ride the first elevator in 2025.
[DM]– As project manager I plan to be at the games to make sure the laser is transported, installed and operating, with all teams supported. As for the first elevator ride… I will keep the load balanced, riding with Holger. 🙂
Thank you very much gentlemen for your time. I look forward to meeting you at the upcoming Games.
Followers of last year’s Space Elevator Games may remember that team members of the McGill Space Elevator Team narrowly averted tragedy in a car/trailer accident which they were involved in on the way to the games. The picture and story of the crash (chronicled here) looked awful and I think it was a miracle that a) no one was hurt and b) they were actually able to get their climber together to compete. They “double-dipped” on their power-source, wanting to go with both solar and microwave power. During the competition, however, they ultimately went only with a microwave beam, an attempt that was unsuccessful. They were more successful, however, in the Light Racers competition, producting the car that was, by far, the fastest one in the competition.
And, no sooner than I put up a 
I received this email from Bert Murray, captain of one of the new entries into this year’s Space Elevator Games, the 
Tomorrow, Sunday, March 2nd, Ken Davidian, NASA’s man at the Spaceward Games (and other Centennial Challenges), will be interviewed on Dr. David Livingston’s 
Ken is now the NASA ESMD (Exploration Systems Mission Directorate) Commercial Development Policy Lead.
Today, the 
The Climber/Power-Beaming team from USST has been very busy as of late, but they were kind enough to reply to a “status request” email I sent out a while ago. I received this reply to my questions from Patrick Allen, USST team member:
All,
As noted in earlier postings, both 
Someone has put together an “Earth Track Controller (E-T-C) Montage” video and posted it on YouTube. For those of you who don’t know, 
The University of Michigan’s 
Teams competing in this year’s Space Elevator Games are sure to beat a path to the DILAS booth at the Photonics West Exhibition. Both USST and Lasermotive, the two laser-powered teams in the 2007 Space Elevator Games, used Laser Diode products from DILAS to power their climber and many more are certainly considering using them this year.
Beginning this week, the 
As has been pointed out to me (several times), the original numbers I posted (
In my 
Yes the Games are over and yes I’m sure that 99% of the readers here already know the results. But I did a search on the various articles written in a “wrap-up mode” and am posting some of them here. All of them (IMHO) contain some info I didn’t know or were , in other ways interesting…
A few days ago, Brian Turner, captain of the Kansas City Space Pirates, sent out his version of the 2007 Spaceward Games wrap-up. I’d like to emphasize that this is HIS viewpoint, not necessarily mine nor Spaceward’s. But I think he’s pretty accurate and it makes for very interesting reading.
I’ve finally been able to upload the videos of the five runs that USST did on the last day of competition (Monday, October 22nd.) The first video shows a climb in the daylight. Therefore, you can’t actually see the laser-beam as my camcorder shot it in “normal” (i.e. not night) mode. But there is a nice sunset in the background to compensate 🙂