ISDC2008 - Day 3

May 31st, 2008

Today was the last full day of this year’s ISDC conference and also a day which saw the two sessions devoted to the idea of a Space Elevator.

The first session today was presented by independent researcher Jim Dempsey and was entitled Space Elevator Initial Deployment.  Jim is not convinced that the tether deploymen proposed by Brad Edwards (i.e., placing an initial ribbon carrying a climber at Geo and then spooling the ribbon down to earth) will work, mainly due to ribbon fluctuations.  He’s proposed an alternative, deploying many tether fibers individually down to earth and then, when a sufficient number of them are in place, sending a climber up the ‘bundle’, combining them into a tether as it goes.  He has an Internet-reachable presentation which I’m unable to find at the moment - I”ll link to it when I can find it.

Incidentally, I’ve mentioned Jim in a couple of previous posts (here, where he related a very prescient observation from Sir Isaac Newton, and here, where he weighs in on the paper by Nicolas Pugno) and he will be presenting at this year’s Space Elevator Conference.

.

Next up was a joint presentation by Ben Shelef of the Spaceward Foundation and Bert Murray of the National Space Society (NSS) Space Elevator Team.  Ben went first and gave an overview of the Space Elevator Games, discussing how/why they were founded, their history and their current status.

Bert then took the stage and gave an interesting presentation of what the NSS team is planning to do.  The prize money for theClimber/Power-Beaming competition is being awarded in two different levels; $900,000 for a single winner with valid climb of 2m/s and $2,000,000 for a single winner with a valid climb of 5m/s.  The NSS team is going for the whole $2,000,000.

Finally, we have a photo of the “concept” climber built by the NSS Space Elevator team.  It is the one they used in the BBC documentary I blogged about here.  It is a small unit (for reference, I placed a quarter on the table just in front of it), but appears very rugged and efficient.  And, obviously it worked…

.

I’ll do a wrap-up post tomorrow or Monday.

(As always, click on the thumbnails for a larger version of the picture)

Entry Filed under: News / Announcements

8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. ISDC 2008 - Day 3 - Out o&hellip  |  June 1st, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    […] Afternoon Part 1: Google Lunar X-Prize: Hobbyspace Instapundit Part 2: SBSP Economics: Hobbyspace Part 3: Space Elevators: Space Elevator Blog […]

  • 2. ZEITGEIST&hellip  |  June 1st, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    […] REPORTING ON SPACE ELEVATORS at the ISDC. […]

  • 3. Daniel  |  June 2nd, 2008 at 7:20 am

    Can someone explain how these constructs won’t be affected by the magnetic fields??

    I thought that such ribbons would generate current?

  • 4. Poshboy  |  June 2nd, 2008 at 8:15 am

    I always thought the 5% gravity reduction breakthrough described in Nick Cook’s “Hunt For Zero Point” would be perfect to place under the elevator itself. Any reduction in weight will help the climber and preserve the ribbon.

    ‘Course, anti-gravity devices are said not to exist…

  • 5. DensityDuck  |  June 2nd, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    Poshboy: Perhaps we could also install a four-dimensional pyramidal timecube onto the climber to assist with the gravometric spaciotemporalization.

  • 6. grs  |  June 3rd, 2008 at 2:07 am

    It’s nice to dream, but the space elevator will exist only in the realm of science fiction. Its supporters have minimized the problem of the avoidance of satellites and debris. There are just too many objects orbiting the Earth for the elevator to successfully dodge indefinitely, regardless of the hoped-for pie-in-the-sky tracking systems some people call on to solve this problem.

  • 7. Ted Semon  |  June 3rd, 2008 at 11:54 am

    Most of the debris is just that, debris. A good laser can take care of them. ‘Dead’ satellites can be taken care of the same way. The only issue (IMHO) are ‘live satellites’. There is not going to be many of these and these can be handled by a) either moving the Space Elevator (which is why it’s going to be built on a movable ocean platform) or else zapping it too (with the agreement of the owner) in return for offering a couple of free launches (or some other satisfactory arrangement).

  • 8. Jonathan  |  July 29th, 2012 at 3:33 am

    Nice post which The first session today was presented by independent researcher Jim Dempsey and was entitled Space Elevator Initial Deployment. In which Ben went first and gave an overview of the Space Elevator Games, discussing how/why they were founded, their history and their current status. Thanks a lot for posting.

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Key Websites

Post Categories

Reference Sites

Images and Animations

Blogroll

Discussion / Networking Groups

Companies & Individuals

Lobbying Organizations

Space Elevator Humor

Mutual Link society

Past Events

Calendar

September 2014
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Posts by Month

www.flickr.com
Space Elevator Blogger's items Go to Space Elevator Blogger's photostream

Stat Counter

free counters

    follow me on Twitter

    Feedburner