{"id":253,"date":"2006-06-02T23:59:13","date_gmt":"2006-06-03T04:59:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/?p=253"},"modified":"2006-06-11T01:34:11","modified_gmt":"2006-06-11T06:34:11","slug":"dont-book-your-tickets-just-yet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/?p=253","title":{"rendered":"Blogger responses to Nicola Pugno study"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There have been a lot of blogger posts about the <a href=\"http:\/\/xxx.lanl.gov\/abs\/cond-mat\/0601668\">Nicola Pugno study<\/a>.\u00a0 Rather than continue to put each one in a separate entry, I&#8217;m going to combine them in this one.<\/p>\n<p>02JUN06<\/p>\n<p>At Advanced Technology, David Louisa is <a href=\"http:\/\/advancedfuturetechnology.blogspot.com\/2006\/06\/nanotubes-might-not-have-right-stuff.html\">optimistic<\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>At Space.QJ.Net, they&#8217;re <a href=\"http:\/\/space.qj.net\/Hopes-for-Carbon-Nanotube-Space-Elevators-Snapped\/pg\/49\/aid\/50059\">concentrating<\/a> on which channel of Muzak should be playing.<\/p>\n<p>Space.com&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.space.com\/businesstechnology\/technovel_nanotubes_060602.html\">take<\/a> on it&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>31MAY06<\/p>\n<p>Over at The End of the Universe, Captain Xerox (copy that) is all <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theendoftheuniverse.ca\/node\/153\">doom-and-gloom<\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>29MAY06<\/p>\n<p>Eric Zorn is a columnist at the Chicago Tribune and he&#8217;s one of my favorite reads.\u00a0 In his blog &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.chicagotribune.com\/news_columnists_ezorn\/2006\/05\/land_of_linkin_3.html#comments\">Change of Subject<\/a>&#8220;, he wrote this: &#8220;The idea of a space elevator was popularized in science fiction, where writers envisioned a 100,000-kilometre-long cable stretching straight up from the Earth&#8217;s surface and fixed in a geosynchronous orbit. Payloads, or tourists, would simply ascend the cable into low-Earth orbit, eliminating the need for rocket launches.&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2006\/060522\/full\/060522-1.html\">Nature.com discusses the latest research<\/a>. <span style=\"font-size: 0.8em\"><font size=\"2\">(via <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/digg.com\/\"><font size=\"2\">Digg<\/font><\/a><font size=\"2\">)<\/font><\/span>&#8220;.\u00a0 The Nature.com story is, of course, the negative one saying that a carbon nanotubes won&#8217;t work because of their &#8220;inherent defects.&#8221;\u00a0 It&#8217;s nice to have the Space Elevator mentioned by someone with such a large audience, but anyone looking at only this story will not see the other side of the story.\u00a0 I left a comment directing people to my blog &#8211; others may wish to point his readers to other information.<\/p>\n<p>28MAY06<\/p>\n<p>At sciscoop.com, Chad <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciscoop.com\/story\/2006\/5\/28\/6453\/20834\">quotes<\/a> Clarke&#8217;s First Law in response.<\/p>\n<p>27MAY06<\/p>\n<p>At Instapundit, Glenn Reynolds is <a href=\"http:\/\/instapundit.com\/archives\/030593.php\">not discouraged<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/brent.kearneys.ca\/technology\/2006\/space-elevator-project-encounters-skepticism\/\">Neither<\/a> is Brent Kearney.<\/p>\n<p>Bill Christensen at Technovelgy.com <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technovelgy.com\/ct\/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=639\">weighs in<\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>26MAY06<\/p>\n<p>The Slashdot crowd <a href=\"http:\/\/science.slashdot.org\/science\/06\/05\/26\/2251258.shtml\">weighs in<\/a>\u00a0with several hunred comments in their thread on the subject&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>25MAY06<\/p>\n<p>Skeptipundit <a href=\"http:\/\/skeptipundit.blogspot.com\/2006\/05\/doubts-about-space-elevator.html\">says<\/a> &#8220;&#8230;does seem that there are some new challenges to overcome.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Colony Worlds <a href=\"http:\/\/colonyworlds.blogspot.com\/2006\/05\/possible-setback-for-space-elevator.html\">opines<\/a> that it&#8217;s much too soon to draw conclusions.<\/p>\n<p>Tom Nugent at LiftPort is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.liftport.com\/progress\/wp\/?p=839\">not discouraged<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>At the Velcro City Tourist Board (cool name, that), he&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.velcro-city.co.uk\/blog\/2006\/05\/25\/elevators-or-piers\/\">disappointed but not discouraged<\/a>.\u00a0 He also weighs in on the Space Pier option.<\/p>\n<p>futurismic&#8217;s Armchair Anarchist <a href=\"http:\/\/www.futurismic.com\/2006\/05\/space_elevator_blogstorm.html\">says<\/a> we&#8217;ve created a blogstorm.<\/p>\n<p>LiftPort&#8217;s Brian Dunbar <a href=\"http:\/\/space4commerce.blogspot.com\/2006\/05\/response-to-space-elevator-is-doomed_25.html\">says<\/a> that nothing has really changed.<\/p>\n<p>24MAY06<\/p>\n<p>At My Corner of the Universe, blogger Cameron Peters <a href=\"http:\/\/cameronjpeters.blogspot.com\/2006\/05\/dont-book-your-tickets-just-yet.html\">hopes<\/a> that despite the objections of Nicola Pugno, he&#8217;ll still be able to take a ride in a Space Elevator.<\/p>\n<p>At advanced nanotechnology, blogger Brian Wang <a href=\"http:\/\/advancednano.blogspot.com\/2006\/05\/challenges-making-bulk-carbon.html\">weighs in<\/a> with his opinion, that the <a href=\"http:\/\/discuss.foresight.org\/~josh\/tower\/tower.html\">Space Pier<\/a> is a superior concept and can be built with today&#8217;s materials.<\/p>\n<p>22MAY06<\/p>\n<p>At Pop Philosophy, Daniel Moore <a href=\"http:\/\/www.danielfmoore.com\/tp\/blog\/no-more-space-elevator\">comments<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Hyperion Court <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pushby.com\/friends\/jesse\/archives\/008397.html\">weighs<\/a> in on Space Elevators, including the latest controversy.\u00a0 As always, Brian was there ahead of me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There have been a lot of blogger posts about the Nicola Pugno study.\u00a0 Rather than continue to put each one in a separate entry, I&#8217;m going to combine them in this one. 02JUN06 At Advanced Technology, David Louisa is optimistic&#8230; At Space.QJ.Net, they&#8217;re concentrating on which channel of Muzak should be playing. Space.com&#8217;s take on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog-entries"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=253"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spaceelevatorblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}