<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LaserMotive shows us what 1km looks like</title>
	<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078</link>
	<description>For scalable, inexpensive access to space...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-398320</link>
		<author>Dan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-398320</guid>
		<description>Like it or not nothing is going to happen without a decent 'commercial' infrastructure in space.  This, and others, are all large projects requiring the kind of investment/return that only commercial activity can produce.  This tech is maturing at a decent rate... so get to supporting commecialization of space or you will find yourselves with a great idea that has no legs.

We have about 30 years before things are tight enough here on the ground that such 'investment potential' won't be possible to create if it doesn't already exist.  Get on the stick with other things fast or someday you will be telling your grandkids, if you have them, how great it "could have been".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it or not nothing is going to happen without a decent &#8216;commercial&#8217; infrastructure in space.  This, and others, are all large projects requiring the kind of investment/return that only commercial activity can produce.  This tech is maturing at a decent rate&#8230; so get to supporting commecialization of space or you will find yourselves with a great idea that has no legs.</p>
<p>We have about 30 years before things are tight enough here on the ground that such &#8216;investment potential&#8217; won&#8217;t be possible to create if it doesn&#8217;t already exist.  Get on the stick with other things fast or someday you will be telling your grandkids, if you have them, how great it &#8220;could have been&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obelisktron--warning: redirection needed, humanity in peril</title>
		<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-383291</link>
		<author>Obelisktron--warning: redirection needed, humanity in peril</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 04:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-383291</guid>
		<description>Hey humans. Could you please start re-directing your campaign efforts to the launch loop instead of the space elevator? The space elevator will not arrive in time to rescue the world from the energy crisis, which will start happening in 2030, as coal reserves start to run out and in 2010, when oil starts skyrocketing again...

what you need to do, is either build a launch loop, which is well whithin your current capabilities, or, if all else fails, do the tried and true project orion...Both of these would allow cheap delivery of solar sattelites, which could easily supply all of your grid needs, and evne synthetic hydrocarbon needs until you transition to all electric cars over the course of the first half of this century and fusion for the grid in order not to be vulnerable to solar storms (I highly doubt a huge solar flare like the carrington event will happen in that 50 year window, if it does, you can always launch another orion spacecraft..if you can't, well, then your totally screwed). 


You would only need one orion spacecraft....so, despite the 'fears' of nuclear fallout...which is minimal...even if they somehow were..you are just launching one into space...just one spacecraft...But one huge orion spacecraft powered by nuclear explosions would be enough to launch either one or thousands of solar satellites, which could supply all of your grid needs and synthetic hydrocarbons as suggested..

I would prefer the launch loop, because once constructed, you could continuesly send things up in space at a very affordable price. However, if you get caught up in a bind...I think it makes sense to start preparing an orion right now, so that if you ever do face that gap in the cliff, you sure as hell can go over it.

So, all you nerdy earthlings on this blog---go and start campaigning...journalist pseudoscientists sci fi geeks...Go and start raising awareness and bring back the huge arm that got mobilized to build the space elevator, to now put its sites on the launch loop. 

its totally whithin your current capabilities. Do it, and stop waiting for a technology that will only appear in the second half of the 21st century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey humans. Could you please start re-directing your campaign efforts to the launch loop instead of the space elevator? The space elevator will not arrive in time to rescue the world from the energy crisis, which will start happening in 2030, as coal reserves start to run out and in 2010, when oil starts skyrocketing again&#8230;</p>
<p>what you need to do, is either build a launch loop, which is well whithin your current capabilities, or, if all else fails, do the tried and true project orion&#8230;Both of these would allow cheap delivery of solar sattelites, which could easily supply all of your grid needs, and evne synthetic hydrocarbon needs until you transition to all electric cars over the course of the first half of this century and fusion for the grid in order not to be vulnerable to solar storms (I highly doubt a huge solar flare like the carrington event will happen in that 50 year window, if it does, you can always launch another orion spacecraft..if you can&#8217;t, well, then your totally screwed). </p>
<p>You would only need one orion spacecraft&#8230;.so, despite the &#8216;fears&#8217; of nuclear fallout&#8230;which is minimal&#8230;even if they somehow were..you are just launching one into space&#8230;just one spacecraft&#8230;But one huge orion spacecraft powered by nuclear explosions would be enough to launch either one or thousands of solar satellites, which could supply all of your grid needs and synthetic hydrocarbons as suggested..</p>
<p>I would prefer the launch loop, because once constructed, you could continuesly send things up in space at a very affordable price. However, if you get caught up in a bind&#8230;I think it makes sense to start preparing an orion right now, so that if you ever do face that gap in the cliff, you sure as hell can go over it.</p>
<p>So, all you nerdy earthlings on this blog&#8212;go and start campaigning&#8230;journalist pseudoscientists sci fi geeks&#8230;Go and start raising awareness and bring back the huge arm that got mobilized to build the space elevator, to now put its sites on the launch loop. </p>
<p>its totally whithin your current capabilities. Do it, and stop waiting for a technology that will only appear in the second half of the 21st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-369100</link>
		<author>ted</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-369100</guid>
		<description>how about a system that used a loop cable like a conventional elevator, with a massive pulley on each end?  then just turn one of the pulleys, and away it goes  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about a system that used a loop cable like a conventional elevator, with a massive pulley on each end?  then just turn one of the pulleys, and away it goes  <img src='http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto Enriquez</title>
		<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-354152</link>
		<author>Alberto Enriquez</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-354152</guid>
		<description>Just wondering if anyone's considered using a deep mining shaft for these tests?  The DUSEL (Deep Underground Science &#38; Engineering Lab) now being developed at the old Homstake mine in South Dakota has shafts going to 4,850 and 6,200 feet, or nearly 1.5 km and 1.9 km respectively.  Why not race down and up as opposed to up and down?

I don't have any information on how wide these shafts are, but if sufficiently wide for the Space Elevator Games, this would provide a far steadier and less energy intensive platform than a helicopter, and could be anchored firmly at both ends.  Why it would almost be like . . . a space elevator. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering if anyone&#8217;s considered using a deep mining shaft for these tests?  The DUSEL (Deep Underground Science &amp; Engineering Lab) now being developed at the old Homstake mine in South Dakota has shafts going to 4,850 and 6,200 feet, or nearly 1.5 km and 1.9 km respectively.  Why not race down and up as opposed to up and down?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any information on how wide these shafts are, but if sufficiently wide for the Space Elevator Games, this would provide a far steadier and less energy intensive platform than a helicopter, and could be anchored firmly at both ends.  Why it would almost be like . . . a space elevator. <img src='http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-331852</link>
		<author>Pete</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-331852</guid>
		<description>A trade off scheme: Attaching a ballon + a small rocket to the space elevator. 
Let the ballon left the elevator to 70Km.
Ignite the laser guided rocket to relay from there lifting the elevator to 100 Km above ground where the gravity is no more significant.  
Then let elevator starts climbing the ribbon there. We don't even need ribbon in the initial 100Km. And the strength requirement for the ribbon is greatly relieved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A trade off scheme: Attaching a ballon + a small rocket to the space elevator.<br />
Let the ballon left the elevator to 70Km.<br />
Ignite the laser guided rocket to relay from there lifting the elevator to 100 Km above ground where the gravity is no more significant.<br />
Then let elevator starts climbing the ribbon there. We don&#8217;t even need ribbon in the initial 100Km. And the strength requirement for the ribbon is greatly relieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-188319</link>
		<author>Brian</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-188319</guid>
		<description>Whats happening? do we have a time and place for the next challenge?Please let me know. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats happening? do we have a time and place for the next challenge?Please let me know. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humber</title>
		<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-172389</link>
		<author>Humber</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-172389</guid>
		<description>Nice Article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Semon</title>
		<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-170611</link>
		<author>Ted Semon</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-170611</guid>
		<description>I just checked the Spaceward web site and it was fine, so whatever problem there was, it was temporary.

The Space Elevator Games are definitely ON, but the timing is still uncertain.  We hope to have a resolution of the date in the next couple of weeks.

Thanks for watching / waiting :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked the Spaceward web site and it was fine, so whatever problem there was, it was temporary.</p>
<p>The Space Elevator Games are definitely ON, but the timing is still uncertain.  We hope to have a resolution of the date in the next couple of weeks.</p>
<p>Thanks for watching / waiting <img src='http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-170309</link>
		<author>Gloria</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.spaceelevatorblog.com/?p=1078#comment-170309</guid>
		<description>What's happening with the November Space Elevator games?  Every web and link connected to Spaceward is down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s happening with the November Space Elevator games?  Every web and link connected to Spaceward is down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
